Now Reading
Good Aerations
Dark Light

Good Aerations

The health and welfare of a typical pond or lake depends on a long list of factors – not the least of which, says engineer Erich Altvater, is proper aeration. If you get it right, he says, you can improve water quality; miss the mark, however, and many man-made ponds or lakes will fall into an unwelcome imbalance. Here, he explains what it takes to understand the water’s needs and guide clients to the proper aerating system.

The health and welfare of a typical pond or lake depends on a long list of factors - not the least of which, says engineer Erich Altvater, is proper aeration.  If you get it right, he says, you can improve water quality; miss the mark, however, and many man-made ponds or lakes will fall into an unwelcome imbalance.  Here, he explains what it takes to understand the water's needs and guide clients to the proper aerating system.

As the watershaping industry gets more involved with naturalistic bodies of water – particularly large ponds, lakes and streams intended to harbor life in the forms of aquatic plants and fish – it becomes increasingly worthwhile to understand the important role of proper aeration.

Aeration is a simple process involving the injection of dissolved oxygen (DO) into water. Nature aerates by way of things such as waterfalls and rain – activities we must imitate by mechanical means in our man-made settings if fish are to be healthy and a host of water-quality problems are to be avoided. This is why many man-made lakes and ponds have some form of mechanical aerator.

The issue becomes somewhat more complex, however, when you’re faced with selecting an aeration system for any given watershape: Every body of water is different, and developing a nearly individualized approach to each one’s oxygen demand is important in making an informed decision about the best form of aeration to apply. And when you add in the fact that many types of aerators also look like fountains – a big plus for designers and clients concerned with appearance as well as function – there’s an aesthetic component to consider as well.

Let’s start with the fundamentals and aeration in general before we get around to aerating with visual appeal in mind.


Aeration is all about oxygen, an elemental gas that is essential to sustaining nearly all forms of life and myriad natural processes, including the decomposition of organic matter.

Fish and other waterborne animals need adequate levels of oxygen to survive. DO promotes the oxidation of organic nutrients and displaces the water’s concentration of other gases, promoting the overall health of the aquatic environment.

This concept of dissolving a gas in a liquid is pretty simple in scientific terms, but it’s easier to grasp when illustrated by an analogy like this one: A hot can of soda will “pop” more when opened than will a cold one. This is because warmer fluids lose their ability to retain dissolved gases. When you apply this concept to a pond, lake or stream, you can understand why the need for aeration increases significantly in summer, when water temperatures rise.

When you add living organisms to the picture, things get even more complicated. All ponds have algae, for example, that will add oxygen during the day and subtract it at night. In other words, you’re working with a living system that changes hour to hour, so you have to avoid the trap of thinking of your lake or pond or stream in static terms. (The respiratory efforts of algae, by the way, explain why it’s a bad idea to shut aerators off overnight – just when the water needs oxygen most!)

As important as aeration is, it is not a magic bullet: Challenges arising from shallow depth, the presence of heavy plant and animal life or limited circulation can tax any system and make it very difficult for any type of aerator to maintain adequate DO levels.

Lighting the Spray

Surface aerators can be used to great aesthetic effect – especially at night. White light can be beautiful, shot up through the spray pattern – and a clear lens will pass 97% of light from a fixture into the stream.

(Color lenses pass as much as 50% and as little as 10%. This should be considered in selecting colors for use in areas of high ambient light, such as restaurants or miniature-golf courses, or in mixing colors so that certain shades are not washed out.)

Low-voltage lighting is subject to voltage drops on long runs, although it does offer freedom from nuisance tripping of GFCIs. (This is not a total blessing, however, as it also hides leaky fixtures and damaged cables.) As a rule, larger spray patterns require the higher wattages offered by line-voltage (120 volt) fixtures.

And keep in mind that better quality fixtures are easier to service reliably. Remember, you may find yourself hanging off the stern of a boat to do so!

– E.A.

In this sense, the role of oxygen in the overall health of the water’s living biosystem has profound implications for the construction process with respect to issues such as depth. The simple fact is that many man-made lakes and ponds are too shallow – probably an attempt on someone’s part to trim a few bucks off the excavation bill.

A too-shallow pond or lake is really a marsh in the making. Sunlight easily penetrates to the bottom, making plant growth a potentially explosive issue. This leads to stopgap measures such as the purchase of aquatic dyes that effectively make the pond “deeper” in terms of light penetration. It also starts water managers on circuits of chemical treatments that control growth – but produce dead organic material that must decompose and in so doing will further rob the water of dissolved oxygen.

To be sure, chemical manufacturers recommend treating the water in stages to avoid fish kill, but real-world situations often spiral out of control. It’s also true in the real world that aeration will reduce the need for these chemical applications and their associated risks and expense.

And if you happen to work in an area where the use of herbicides or dyes is restricted – particularly if your lake overflows into another body of water – achieving health through aeration may be your only option.


The factors that have come up so far – size, depth, circulation, aquatic life – all place their demands on an aeration system. Depending on the application or the type of the body of water being considered, that demand can change dramatically in ways that dictate your choice of aerators.

On one end of the spectrum, the most demanding needs for aeration are found in the aquaculture industry, where fish are maintained in unnaturally high concentrations with correspondingly high DO demands. At the other, decorative ponds and streams demand much less from their aeration systems.

Paddlewheels, compressed-air units and aspirating injectors all have their niches in the aeration business, but none of them rank high on the beauty scale for residential applications.

• Paddlewheels are bulky devices that create splashing/aerating effects similar to those generated by cascades and waterfalls. They are well regarded by the aquaculture industry for their efficiency at oxygen transfer, but they’re not intended for public use.

• Compressed-air units feature a shore-mounted compressor that must be mounted in an enclosure to reduce noise. Air is then distributed by a weighted air hose to air stones distributed across the lake’s bottom. If the water isn’t deep enough, there might not be enough rise time to enable the bubbles to dissipate before reaching the surface, which can cause an appearance issue and reduce performance. By contrast, very deep waters tax compressed-air systems by requiring more horsepower to overcome head pressure.

• Aspirating aerators use a pump to force water through a venturi that aspirates air into the flow. These devices are useful in applying aeration and circulation to problem spots, and do so without creating a visible spray pattern.

Many customers, however, want to see something dramatic in return for paying their utility bills, which is why floating-fountain aerators are becoming increasingly popular – a practical and aesthetic solution.

Floating units disperse water through the air, increasing droplet surface area and, consequently, dissolved oxygen content. Another benefit is increased circulation that distributes the DO where it will do some good. In fact, this circulation offers added value by breaking up layers of thermal stratification and reducing fish kills that can result from thermal inversions that hit ponds seasonally. Increased DO also will help aquatic microorganisms and the aerobic bacteria that decompose sludge.


Floating aerators are held in place either by shoreline ropes or by ropes tied to anchors or concrete blocks. Shoreline ropes can be used to pull the unit to shore for servicing, but most residential and almost all public installations use the anchor approach, which requires use of a boat for re-lamping of light fixtures or cleaning. (Safety is a must: Maintenance personnel should wear life vests, and electric-panel lock-outs should always be used when service is in progress.)

These fountains come in one of two forms: units with motors and surface propellers (usually called aerators) and units with centrifugal and mixed-flow pumps (usually called floating fountains).

Motorized propeller units move more water per horsepower than do centrifugal pumps, producing a heavier pattern of droplets – but this occurs across a smaller area.

Depending on the unit, the manufacturer and the application, these devices also may raise noise issues, and older designs can be bothered by ice or debris. The push for UL certification has made finger-safe intake screens the norm, making cleaning requirements increasingly similar to those applied with fountains.

Fountains with centrifugal and mixed-flow pumps offer an extensive variety of water effects that cover wider areas – everything from the middle ground of flow and pressure up to high-pressure, multiple-stage turbine designs used to generate decorative patterns that reach heights of more than 30 feet. Here, it’s a matter of selecting the unit that gives your clients desired features and long-term flexibility.

With both these systems, appearance and circulation are tied together. A vertical plume is simple, classic and dramatic, for example, and achieves the greatest height the pump can deliver – but the water falls directly back to the pump intake, so the system has a lesser effect on overall circulation than would a system with a wider fan pattern.

Electrical Issues

It’s beyond the scope of this article to get into the subtleties of the National Electric Code, UL listings and the occasional gray areas that now exist between them. The next NEC will address floating fountains, as UL has recently done with a new listing category.

In brief, however, NEC Article 680 requires fountains with submersible motors – which is how most floating units are considered by electrical inspectors – to be GFCI protected and to operate with pumps at 230 or 115 volts, lights at 115 or 12 volts. Be advised that some manufacturers sell products that operate at 460 volts and get around the NEC by labeling them as aerators, which are not clearly defined in the rules. Others leave out GFCI protection and timers to cut the price of the floating device and shift the cost into what the owner must provide on shore.

Let the buyer beware: The major manufacturers in the industry will not sell floating fountains without GFCI panels; if the big guys don’t want the liability, why should you?

GFCI protection should be located near the shore. This has a couple of benefits: It reduces the length of underwater cable running to the fountain (a substantial savings, especially given the lower cost of running a feeder line from the panel to the GFCI) and also minimizes the possibility of nuisance tripping. And if turtles or muskrats attack the cable, replacement costs will be reduced by having the shortest-possible cable run out to the aerator.

It’s also a good idea to run a conduit sleeve from the shore to the GFCI panel to allow the cables to be pulled into place and attached. This protects the cables from mowing and vandalism. And be generous with the diameter: It’ll come in handy a few years down the road when the conduit is filled with mud and crawdads and you need to pull the cable back out!

– E.A.

But while a wide fan pattern may be better for circulation, the practical approach may not be the best one aesthetically if the lake or pond level is a few feet below the bank and the fan cannot easily be seen. For this reason, many designers turn to combination units that deliver center and horizontal sprays or arch patterns as a compromise. It’s also possible to get models with interchangeable nozzles to produce a variety of effects – allowing selection of seasonal configurations for maximum decorative or aerating effects.

As might be expected, these units range in size from quite small to quite massive. Ease of installation and maintenance is obviously influenced by product design, so you need to make sure at the outset that the body of water is deep enough and has sufficient shoreline slope to make the selected unit workable.

As for the working part of the system, the pumps are rated in horsepower – which doesn’t necessarily tell you what you need to know. Some in the trade use “one to two horsepower per acre” as a rule of thumb, but that doesn’t factor in either depth or shape. Often, for example, the best decision is to go with two smaller units at the end of an elongated lake rather than a big gun in the middle. (This two-fountain approach is also useful in providing redundancy when one unit is down for service.)

Many of these systems also come with accessories that may prove useful. If your clients opt for great height, for example, you should think about installing wind sensors and controls. Also, most products have separate cabling for pumps and lights. This feature makes for easier upgrades and repairs through the years.


The ultimate sin with respect to aeration is to ignore it altogether, but that’s rarely a problem because any level of experience with living watershapes usually cures professionals of the tendency to walk away from this fundamental need. [main text continues below the sidebar]

Aerator or Fountain?

By Lisa A. Berosh

Fountains have been a focal point in the center of almost every European city for more than a thousand years. From the fountains of Rome to the fountains of Versailles and beyond, every man, woman and child is familiar with the grace of these watershapes.

Comparatively speaking, aerators are relative newcomers: Invented during the Industrial Revolution, aerators are environmental tools that have many applications.

The difference between an aerator and a fountain is clear in concept, but not necessarily in appearance. Where the primary purpose of an aerator is to improve the environment by oxygenating water, fountains are there purely for aesthetic reasons. You might say that it’s like the difference between a tool and a statue.

So why does there seem to be confusion between aerators and fountains? Well, it all boils down to appearances: Both may throw water into the air, but the similarities mostly stop right there.


To understand the real distinction between fountains and aerators, you need to dig into a science called limnology, the study of water-quality maintenance in a lake or a pond. What that science tells us is that we aerate these bodies of water to slow the aging process.

It tells us that all lakes and ponds age based on the levels of oxygen in their water balanced against the amount of nutrient loading. The greater the ratio of oxygen to nutrients (or organic matter), the slower the aging process.

As nutrients for plant and animal life find their ways into the water, bacteria will metabolize or oxidize them. This is known as aerobic digestion. It’s pretty easy to tell when it’s working: In fact, most odors associated with lakes and ponds are usually due to the presence of anaerobic conditions in the lake – meaning there’s not enough oxygen in the water to go around.

As nutrient levels increase, so do oxygen demands. When all of the lake’s available oxygen has been consumed, bad things are at hand: Algae and aquatic weeds grow, creating an unsightly mess. And most algae have two-week life spans, so they’ll soon die and fall to the bottom – thereby adding to the nutrient level and robbing the water of even more oxygen.

Studies have shown that this sediment accumulates at anywhere from 1 to 25 inches per year. The effects of the resulting lowered oxygen levels are the premature aging of the lake, algae and weed growth, unpleasant odors and significantly reduced aesthetic value of the watershape and landscape.

In a nutshell, the highest goal of any manager who oversees a lake or pond is to ensure sufficient oxygen levels in the water.


Into this challenging scene, inject the aerator.

Initially used in wastewater treatment, aerators became a tool in the landscape industry during the early 1970s, when it was recognized that proper aeration practices could replace or limit the use of chemicals. By promoting good water quality and helping to prevent algae growth, aeration served to eliminate odors, prevent sediment build-up and enhance the beauty of the watershape.

As was mentioned in the adjoining feature, this meant application of three basic types of aerators. We at Otterbine-Barebo classify them as bottom diffusers, horizontal aspirators and surface-spray aerators.

The first two types of aerators create no surface disturbances and operate invisibly – a plus if your client is after a purely naturalistic setting. The third type – the popular surface aerator – is the one often confused with a fountain.

They may look the same, but the purpose of an aerator is much more sophisticated in technical terms. As the many droplets travel through the air, they trap atmospheric oxygen, releasing it into the watershape as they strike the surface. The more water you pump into the air, the more oxygen you transfer to the water. This is known as the oxygen transfer rate, which is expressed in pounds of oxygen per horsepower per hour.

Certainly, fountains send water through the air and increase aeration, but because these systems are not designed with oxygen transfer rates in mind, you’ll never really have a way of predetermining how much good a fountain will do.


Knowing this, you can ask some key questions when you’re in the market for an aeration system destined for use on a lake or pond.

For starters, ask the manufacturer if a university or an accredited lab has verified its published oxygen transfer rate. We believe that a good aerator will transfer approximately 2.2 pounds of oxygen per unit of horsepower per hour.

This results in 475 gallons of water being pumped into the air per minute and points to another key distinction between aerators and fountains: Where an aerator will pump large volumes of water at low pressures, fountains mostly pump low volumes of water at high pressures.

To ensure that you are selecting a product truly designed for water-quality management, always ask the manufacturer for their oxygen transfer rates: If they offer them, they’re selling aerators and you’ll have the information you need to make comparisons and intelligent buying decisions.

By selecting the right system, you reap the aesthetic advantages of a fountain and the practical benefits of an aerator – the best of both worlds.

Lisa Berosh is marketing coordinator for Otterbine Barebo, a manufacturer of fountains and other waterfeatures in Emmaus, Pa. She focuses on serving the needs of landscaping, recreation and bio-augmentation industries for the family-owned and operated firm, which has been making surface-spray and sub-surface aeration systems for lakes and ponds for more than 40 years.

Despite general acceptance of the need for adequate aeration, however, the subject is not without debates of both the theoretical and scientific kind. Anyone who works with living bodies of water as a steady diet should spend some time at that higher level of discussion, but the important thing for most professionals is becoming familiar with the fundamentals of aquatic environments and appreciating the role of oxygen and all the processes it influences.

It can take time to sort through marketing claims and the bits of misinformation that can creep into competitive discussions, but for the most part, companies that have been successful at selling aerators have done so with products that work. In that context, the best way to ensure success in building and maintaining lakes, ponds and streams is to learn the critical questions and actively seek the best answers.

Erich Altvater is president of Atlantic Fountains of New Haven, Conn., and has worked for more than 20 years as a systems engineer in the design and construction of fountains and other waterfeatures. His firm specializes in the design and construction of watershapes for architectural settings (including musical and animated fountains) as well as in the installation of aerators and floating fountains for natural environments.

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2021 WaterShapes. All Rights Reserved. Designed Powered By GrossiWeb

Scroll To Top